This panel will examine the values or normative principles that govern legitimate and illegitimate conduct in economic life, particularly as those values are embodied in law.
Although it purports to be opposed to the application of moral principles to the marketplace, neoliberalism has a distinctive moral economy that revolves—at least discursively—around the concept of consumer sovereignty. Morally proper business behavior is whatever maximizes “consumer welfare”. It is by now well established that this picture of the marketplace is riddled with problems in both its descriptive and prescriptive aspects.
Part of the goal of the project of Law and Political Economy must be to articulate a vision of moral economy that does not rely on neoclassical assumptions about how market competition and consumer choice work and that places progressive values like anti-racism, democratic decisions
about conditions of work, and basic social provision for all at its core. This panel begins to ask the question of what such a moral economy would look like.
The following panelists will present the following works-in progress:
Luke Herrine (Yale Law School, LPE Project)
Sanjukta Paul (Wayne State University Law School)
Kate Redburn (Yale University)
Marshall Steinbaum (University of Utah)
Sandeep Vaheesan (Open Markets Institute)