At the Blog
On Monday, Lenore Palladino explained how working people’s retirement savings are being used to fuel the AI bubble.
On Wednesday, Beau Baumann argued that, in addition to rebuilding state capacity, a real reconstruction will require tearing down the symbols and practices that legitimize hierarchy and replacing them with democratic spectacles that let people see themselves as participants in public power.
In LPE Land
Sabeel Rahman released Remaking the State: A New Blueprint for American Democracy.
Daniel Hanley posted a helpful career guide for those interested in U.S. antitrust law.
In Dissent, Veena Dubal and Katie Wells argue that we should forbid firms from using intimate behavioral data to decide what a someone is paid or charged.
At the LSE Inequalities Blog, Shay O’Brien presents new empirical research on the persistence of elite families.
The Critical Legal Collective is seeking submissions for a “Dishonor Roll” to identify people within the legal academy who have capitulated to creeping fascism.
David E. Adelman posted a new empircal study of NEPA Litigation. He finds that there is no current litigation crisis, and that BAAJA’s limits on court remedies would disproportionately benefit fossil-fuel and mining approvals on federal land.
In the Harvard Law Review, Franita Tolson has a new article on disenfranchisement in the age of Callais.
